Comparing Apollo vs. LinkedIn's Sales Navigator is like comparing Batman vs. Iron Man. Both are superheroes, but live in different universes.

While both tools are for lead generation, they serve different purposes and have different features. However, for this article, I compared them from the perspective of a cold email beginner.

Spoiler: Apollo wins, but only based on metrics, since LinkedIn’s Sales Navigator has some advantages if you know how to use them.

Things We Compared In This Article

For this breakdown, I looked at Sales Navigator and Apollo side-by-side across six key areas that make or break cold email campaigns, including:

  1. Data Quality
  2. Prospecting Capabilities
  3. Integration & Ecosystem
  4. User Experience
  5. Cold Email Features
  6. Pricing & Value

Quick Summary for Those in a Rush

Comparison CriteriaApolloSales NavigatorWinner
Data Quality210M contacts, 23 data points per contact, extensive contact info but less fresh1B+ users, 65+ data points, real-time updates, limited contact detailsSales Navigator
ProspectingStrong filtering, lead scoring, AI suggestions50+ filters, real-time intent signals, no native lead scoringTie
Integration40+ native CRM integrations, API access on all plansLimited integrations, most features locked behind Enterprise tierApollo
User ExperienceIntuitive interface, excellent supportClean interface, poor customer supportApollo
Cold Email Features250 emails/day, automations, AI integration50 InMails/month, higher response rate, not built for cold email thoughApollo
Pricing$59/month, credit-based system$99/month, flat fee structureDepends on needs
Overall Best ForQuick cold email campaigns, budget-conscious teamsHigh-quality data, personalized outreach, long-term strategyDepends on needs

Sales Navigator vs. Apollo Round 1: Data Quality

This round focuses on the foundation of any good cold email campaign - reliable data.

LinkedIn’s Sales Navigator has the best data
LinkedIn’s Sales Navigator has the best data

Apollo's Data:

  • 210 million contacts and 35 million companies in their database
  • Provides 23 key data points per contact
  • Has far more emails + sells phone numbers (contact info is their strong suit)
  • Data freshness is a weakness - they scrape LinkedIn but can't update daily
  • Second-hand data that often lags behind real-time changes

Sales Navigator's Data:

  • Direct access to LinkedIn's massive database (1B+ users, 69M+ companies)
  • Delivers 65+ data points if you know how to extract them properly
  • Real-time data updates as professionals and companies change their profiles
  • Limited on contact information - only shows emails when users make them public

Apollo might win on contact details, but that's only a small piece of the puzzle. If you care about having the most current and accurate data for smart-targeting and personalization (which is what truly drives cold email success), Sales Navigator is the go-to tool.

The Bottom Line: When it comes to data quality for demographics, firmographics, and work history, Sales Navigator takes this round by a landslide. The data is fresher, more accurate, and comes straight from the source.

📘 Scraping Sales Navigator Without Risks

If you want the best data that enables you to create perfectly targeted cold email campaigns that bring leads, check out this guide on how to scrape leads from Sales Navigator without risking your account.

Sales Navigator vs. Apollo Round 2: Prospecting Capabilities

Let's compare how each platform helps you find your perfect prospects. This is about search power, filters, and identifying who's worth your time.

This is a hard decision
This is a hard decision

Apollo's Prospecting Capabilities:

  • Account list upload and enrichment to find leads within target companies
  • Robust filtering options comparable to Sales Navigator
  • Intent signals available but can lag behind real-time changes
  • Lead scoring that helps prioritize your outreach (a major advantage)
  • AI-suggested accounts and leads based on your description

Sales Navigator's Prospecting Capabilities:

  • Account list upload with real-time data enrichment
  • 50+ advanced filtering options with unique filters like "posted on LinkedIn, change jobs" to find active users and personalize messages
  • Fresh intent signals pulled directly from user activity
  • No native lead scoring (major drawback)
  • AI-suggested accounts and leads based on your sales patterns and description

The Bottom Line: This round is a tie. Apollo wins on lead scoring and workflow efficiency, while Sales Navigator wins on filter depth and real-time signals. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize automation (Apollo) or data freshness (Sales Navigator).

Sales Navigator vs. Apollo Round 3: Integration & Ecosystem

Now let's evaluate how well each platform integrates with your existing tech stack and supports your sales workflows.

Apollo’s integrations are more accessible
Apollo’s integrations are more accessible

Apollo's Ecosystem:

  • Recently introduced Waterfall Enrichment for more comprehensive data
  • Over 40 native CRM integrations
  • Built as a sales execution platform, so integrations are a core focus
  • Connects seamlessly with email providers, dialers, and other sales tools
  • API access available on all plans

Sales Navigator's Ecosystem:

  • CRM integrations with Salesforce, Dynamics 365, HubSpot, and SalesLoft
  • Create new CRM leads/contacts directly from Sales Navigator
  • View LinkedIn profiles embedded within your CRM
  • The catch: most integrations are only available on Enterprise plans
  • Limited API capabilities compared to Apollo

Apollo wins this round. While Sales Navigator has solid integrations with major CRMs, they lock most of this functionality behind their Enterprise tier. Meanwhile, Apollo is designed from the ground up to play well with others - it needs to be since it's positioning itself as the central hub of your sales tech stack.

Sales Navigator vs. Apollo Round 4: User Experience & Interface

Let's look at how these platforms stack up when it comes to actually using them day-to-day

Apollo has faster support
Apollo has faster support

Apollo's User Experience:

  • Super intuitive interface that's easy to navigate, even with tons of features
  • Visibility is excellent - you can quickly find what you need
  • Customer support: Responsive and helpful - a clear strength
  • User education: Great documentation, tutorials, and onboarding
  • Regular updates that actually improve the platform

Sales Navigator's User Experience:

  • Clean interface that is easy to use
  • Slightly steeper learning curve compared to Apollo, but not a big thing
  • Customer support: Can be a nightmare to deal with - typical big company support issues
  • User education: LinkedIn Learning Sales provides excellent resources, plus thousands of third-party tutorials
  • More diverse learning suite with professional courses for every topic

The Bottom Line: Apollo wins this round. While both tools have excellent interfaces, Apollo's combination of intuitive design and responsive customer support gives it the edge. Sales Navigator isn't bad by any means, but LinkedIn's massive scale (1B+ users) means you're just a ticket number when you need help.

Sales Navigator vs. Apollo Round 5: Cold Email Features

Now let's dive into the crucial features that determine how effectively each platform supports your cold email campaigns.

Sales Navigator isn’t built for cold email
Sales Navigator isn’t built for cold email

Apollo's Cold Email Features:

  • Let's you send up to 250 emails a day on their basic plan
  • Built on automations for scaling up messaging (Daily rate limit of 50 AI-email generations per user per 24 hours)
  • Advanced workflows for calling prospects directly from their platform
  • Website visitor tracking capabilities
  • Re-built their platform in 2025 with deep AI integration, making it one of the most AI-powered sales platforms on the market
  • Excels in contact information, lead scoring, and sequence automation

Sales Navigator's Cold Email Features:

  • Limited to 50 InMails/month (but with 15% average response rate vs 3% for regular emails)
  • Designed for 1-1 messaging to high-value prospects
  • Enables content and ad distribution to B2B audiences through the LinkedIn ecosystem
  • PDF & Smart Links tracking: see how prospects engage with your documents, down to how many seconds they view each page
  • Account IQ and Lead IQ features provide comprehensive insights like headcount, competitive landscape, strategic priorities, and revenue models without any prompts.
  • AI suggests decision makers, helps assess fit, assists with message composition, and facilitates warm intros

The Bottom Line: Apollo takes this round for cold email specifically. While Sales Navigator has impressive tracking features and quality insights, it's fundamentally not built for cold email campaigns.

💡 If You Care About AI & Automation

If you want to combine the best data (from Sales Navigator) with AI and automation, then consider checking out Datablist. While Datablist doesn't support messaging, it’s used by over 20k people to build lead lists by extracting data from Sales Navigator, enriching it with contact information, and using AI to create personalized email first lines, for example.

Sales Navigator vs. Apollo Round 6: Pricing & Value

Let's compare the cost structures and value proposition of both platforms to see which gives you more bang for your buck.

Apollo is like a Swiss knife, only used when necessary
Apollo is like a Swiss knife, only used when necessary

Apollo's Value Proposition:

  • Starting price: $59/month
  • Includes 2,500 credits/month (1 credit per email, 8 credits per phone number)
  • Credit-based system for discovering emails, phone numbers, and using AI features
  • Limited to 250 emails per day
  • All-in-one platform with integrated features
  • Average cold email response rate: around 3% (probably less when you’re starting out)

Sales Navigator's Value Proposition:

  • Starting price: $99/month
  • No credit system - flat monthly fee
  • Limited to 50 InMails per month
  • Higher quality engagement - 15% average response rate on InMails
  • Better data quality, but requires additional tools for a full cold email workflow

The Bottom Line: This round is a tie. Apollo is cheaper and offers more functionality out of the box for cold email campaigns. However, Sales Navigator delivers higher-quality interactions and better data.

Final Decision: Which Tool Is Right For You?

Being honest, I think nobody is comparing Apollo vs. LinkedIn's Sales Navigator because of their messaging capabilities, but because of the data you can get, and when it comes to data, Sales Navigator is the clear winner, even though it doesn't look like it at first glance.

Easy decision
Easy decision

Apollo: Quick & Easy Cold Email Campaigns

Apollo is your best bet if:

  • You're on a tight budget and need to start immediately ($59/month entry point)
  • You want an all-in-one solution without juggling multiple tools
  • You need to quickly build prospect lists and start outreach
  • You need mobile phone numbers for your outreach strategy

Apollo works great if you need a quick win, but remember: as you scale, you'll need to add specialized tools anyway. No all-in-one platform can truly excel at everything.

Sales Navigator: Building a Long-Term Lead Gen Engine

I personally prefer Sales Navigator because:

  • You get data straight from the source - always fresh and accurate
  • It gives you more control over your data (I like to scrape and enrich it myself)
  • It's ideal for building custom workflows that scale
  • There are no third parties between you and your data

Conclusion

If you're serious about lead generation for the long haul, I'd recommend building a proper tech stack with Sales Navigator as your data foundation, then adding separate tools for data enrichment and sequencing. Once you learn how to properly extract and use Sales Navigator data, you'll crush your cold email campaigns.

Frequently Asked Questions About Apollo vs. Sales Navigator

What Is Better Than Sales Navigator?

While Apollo offers a more comprehensive all-in-one solution for cold email campaigns with better pricing and integration capabilities, no single tool is universally "better" than Sales Navigator. For pure data quality and accuracy, Sales Navigator remains superior since it pulls information directly from LinkedIn's source.

Is A Sales Navigator Really Worth It?

Yes, Sales Navigator is worth the investment if you're building a long-term lead generation strategy. Despite its higher price point ($99/month), it provides superior data quality, higher response rates, and serves as an excellent foundation for sophisticated data enrichment through sales navigator scraping.

What Is The Difference Between Apollo And Evaboot?

Apollo is a comprehensive sales engagement platform focused on cold email campaigns, offering data enrichment, lead scoring, and automation features. Evaboot is a newer LinkedIn automation tool focused on scraping.

What Is Apollo Used For In Sales?

Apollo is used as an all-in-one sales execution platform that enables teams to run cold email campaigns at scale. It provides contact information, lead scoring, sequence automation, and allows sending up to 250 emails daily. It's particularly valuable for budget-conscious teams needing quick prospect list building.

Why Was Apollo Banned From LinkedIn?

Apollo is restricted by LinkedIn for violating their terms of service regarding data scraping. LinkedIn protects its user data and prohibits unauthorized collection of member information.

Which Tool is Better For Data Enrichment, Sales Navigator or Apollo?

Sales Navigator does not directly contact information like emails and phones, but it provides high-quality first-party data directly from LinkedIn, which you can scrape with tools like Datablist. Apollo offers automated data enrichment with their Waterfall Enrichment feature and a credit-based system, making it more convenient but also less accurate than Sales Navigator.